deleted
- Thread starter MARK M3
- Start date
Spockboy
Really nice finish on the model.
I completely agree with the lighting comment you made, I mean no disrespect to anyone when I say this but some models have their internal lighting and lighting effects set far too bright and it doesn't look quite right, it spoils the look of the model.
Congratulations on a nicely finished kit.
I completely agree with the lighting comment you made, I mean no disrespect to anyone when I say this but some models have their internal lighting and lighting effects set far too bright and it doesn't look quite right, it spoils the look of the model.
Congratulations on a nicely finished kit.
PHArchivist
Master Member
NIce. THis kit is on my short list to build. Your build-up is inspiring.
PHArchivist
Master Member
Excellent shot...
I am presuming this build is a good "warm-up" prior to the Refit / 1701-A... Would you agree?
For my TOS E, I'm torn. I am sorely tempted to add additional surface detail (largely via fine pencil markings) such as subtle panel lines, hatches, etcetera in order to create a model that appears like it would/should if a current film (i.e. Abrams reboot) used the classic ship, albeit somewhat updated and freshened up.
Or, as you have gone, would it be better to go for complete accuracy to the original 11' model.
Dunno...
Could build two, but don't really have the time or space for two of these.
I am presuming this build is a good "warm-up" prior to the Refit / 1701-A... Would you agree?
For my TOS E, I'm torn. I am sorely tempted to add additional surface detail (largely via fine pencil markings) such as subtle panel lines, hatches, etcetera in order to create a model that appears like it would/should if a current film (i.e. Abrams reboot) used the classic ship, albeit somewhat updated and freshened up.
Or, as you have gone, would it be better to go for complete accuracy to the original 11' model.
Dunno...
Could build two, but don't really have the time or space for two of these.
