Trying to be as objective as I can through all of this...but from what I've gathered, that screen grab was altered to remove one of the participants. It makes sense because how else would a private convo between Mike and Nick get posted here. That being the case, it doesn't seem like the type of evidence people should use to form their opinions (fruit of the poison tree). It may very well be true, but if someone alters one thing, what's to stop them from changing something else? I'm not taking sides here, because there's plenty of other stuff you could use
Have you also seen this screengrab? Regardless of what anyone things about editing the last comment is very clear