feek61
Sr Member
I
But, as you brought it up... what reference are you using for the shape of the lower saucer section? I don't have a good photo of the underside, but the best side shots seem (like most of what you brought up) to match the measurements comparison.
Hey Shaw, to be clear I was only expressing my opinion; hope it didn't come across as saying you were wrong. As far as the reference material I am going from memory from (I guess) the Smithsonian exhibit. I don't remember the dorsal being so long and the bottom of the saucer seemed to be more cone-shaped then what I'm seeing on screen. In any event it's just conjecture on all of our parts but I am enjoying the discussion (well, until I seemed to have pissed you off, lol).
CD, not sure about the change in perspective; I'll have to check that out.