Qui-Gonzalez
Master Member
Three pages of civility. Those are interesting turns, Jez.
Point Mike, let me try a boiling down of my own:
AA products are the most expensive in the entire hobby.
Whether you know their source or not, the result is a sub-par quality product.
They are not accurate. There isn't debate about that anymore.
For half the money, you can do better.
JJ
And away we go! :lol
Honestly, you can't have an AA thread without hearsay. Neither LFL or AA are represented here, so, it is all opinion, one way or the other. I won't bang the drum how I feel, because I did that to death.There should really just be a sticky at the top of the page explaining the differences between the different suit-makers/suits, with none of the here-say involved.
JJ, your points seem to be based on opinion, but are factually incorrect.
Accuracy is - In mclearly a subjective measure - However IMO SDS's TIE is the most accurate replica anyone's made. Irrespective of what people think of the Stormtrooper, the SDS TIE is extremely accurate - just a shame the mohawk isnt quite right. I dont own their DS Gunner but again it seems extremly close, as does the XWing, Fleet Trooper.
Jez
Each maker's helmets' have their pros and cons but all are about equal in terms of how accurate they are to screenused stuff.
Oh, you're just saying that because is probably the most screen accurate.That simply is just not true.
People might like different helmets for different reasons and that is fine.
But accuracy is something that is not subjective.
But accuracy is something that is not subjective.
Mverta i think in the interests of fairness and accuracy point 2 of your summation needs changing to
AA may have or may not have sculpted the original
Or
AA claims to have sculpted the original
My reasoning for this despite what my personal beliefs are to date AA is the only individual to claim to have sculpted the helmets but as yet as far as im aware has not provided concrete evidence of his claim.
Likewise LFL following filing their lawsuit against AA claim that they have proof that AA did not sculpt the helmets but they also have not made any concrete evidence of their claims public.
Both sides claim to have proof but as yet neither sides evidence has become public so in the absence of such proof it isn't possible to say who did or who didn't do the original sculpt.