Well you certainly aren’t the great innovator that you’re implying to be.
Never implied to be.
Well you certainly aren’t the great innovator that you’re implying to be.
Keep up that positive attitude, you’ll make a lot of friends
Sooo, the ANH DL44 discussion. Where did we leave off?
ExactlyTo me, it looks like glue residue left over from holding the tube that was between the two pushrods. I don’t believe there was t-track on it.
Check Mosin Nagant scopes, certainly is not the same, but there are enough similarities to suggest that the hero's could be from a rifle scope of some sort.The original cradle
/mount was really heavy duty machined or cast metal right? It reminds me a lot of old European wartime rifle hardware - I admit I’ve never seen anything like it, I almost wonder if it was part of anti aircraft optics instead of a weapon
There's certainly excess glue and at least some of it is directly on the barrel on the merrsonns, but if the antennas were glued both to the barrel and the middle greeblie - I'm not sure if it is enough to hold the antenna glued to the barrel if you rip off the middle part? I'm thinking along the lines of maybe it was done on the hero like on the merrsonns, but everything was removed and then the antena was glued on top of the old residue.
View attachment 1770839
Maybe it just looks like they are glued to the middle greeblie on the merrsonns because of the angle, but are glued just to the barrel.
After all on the one that is missing surely there's no paint where the antenna was, but I don't see any glue residue there (maybe there's some in the back)
View attachment 1770840