joshvanrad
Sr Member
I hope the visual dictionaries don't fall into the wrong hands. We could be dealing with a really ugly death star situation soon.
Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice
- Thread starter Vivek
- Start date
I hope the visual dictionaries don't fall into the wrong hands. We could be dealing with a really ugly death star situation soon.
it's not a practical prop (at least the voice modulator) - I can say with almost 100% certainty. There are so many reasons why it wouldn't/can't be.
CarverSindile
Active Member
It is an working thing, why dont people believe it. If you seen the movie then people will know its 100 percent practical prop.
- - - Updated - - -
Alot of things in the batman v superman is practical include the grenade launcher in the trailer it could actually shoot the grenade if they wanted to.
I feel like you don't understand how movies are made... why are you so convinced it works in real life? Did you see/read something that specifically said this specific item is a practical prop? And if so, where can I find this info?
CarverSindile
Active Member
The dc entertainment video from youtube, zack synder said it himself, you can read the batman v superman dawn of justice tech manual and the art of batman v superman, and my final answer you can contact the people who worked on batman v superman through social media or if you can find their contact infomation through white pages or any other websites where you can buy people's information http://www.whitepages.com/name/Douglas-Harlocker
CarverSindile
Active Member
I will until somebody proves me otherwise.
matty matt
Sr Member
Guys, we obviously need Ben Affleck himself to come settle this. I'll try to contact him on Facebook.
give me a link to the interview where Zack Snyder says this since I have no way to look in those books.
joshvanrad
Sr Member
See if you can get the map to his kryptonite mine as well.
Funny that there are supposedly so many claims of practical effects in this movie, when all I saw on the commercials and trailer was shoddy looking CGI.
How were they fake? Like, computer generated yolks?
TKRalph
Well-Known Member
If you see it again they look rubbery and too perfect-looking.
You mean if I see it at all, LOL
- - - Updated - - -
They must have spent all their budget on a functional voice modulating bat cowl.
- - - Updated - - -
I keed, I keed
CarverSindile
Active Member
\
He said it in the book.
- - - Updated - - -
my final answer you can contact the people who worked on batman v superman through social media or if you can find their contact infomation through white pages or any other websites where you can buy people's information http://www.whitepages.com/name/Douglas-Harlocker
Last edited by a moderator:
gonk27
Sr Member
Batman's voice effect is done in post as you'd expect. Affleck says so here:
https://youtu.be/fZp9nPfxJj0?t=14
Saw the film the other night, it was ok. Affleck was much better than I'd expected though.
Last edited by a moderator:
CarverSindile
Active Member
That's not possible because it said it in the book and if you saw the film then you would know somebody else used it.
- - - Updated - - -
https://youtu.be/v7ldSDAQaBw
Last edited by a moderator:
gonk27
Sr Member
The guy in your link is describing the fictional 'Tech Cowl' Batman supposedly wears, and the microphone that allows him to communicate with Alfred back at base.
Mr Mold Maker
Master Member
:facepalm
Yes, the Tech Cowl was a practical prop. That does not mean it was a FUNCTIONAL prop.
NO, it didn't work. And NO it wasn't under the cowl. The cowl in the film was a skin tight rubber cowl.. The tech cowl wouldn't have even fit on Ben..especially not under the cowl.
Yes, the Tech Cowl was a practical prop. That does not mean it was a FUNCTIONAL prop.
NO, it didn't work. And NO it wasn't under the cowl. The cowl in the film was a skin tight rubber cowl.. The tech cowl wouldn't have even fit on Ben..especially not under the cowl.
Similar threads
