so is the world war z game any good?, I am also liking the days gone trailer's..
so is the world war z game any good?, I am also liking the days gone trailer's..
Not sure I'm gonna continue with that one, and might just skip to The Witcher 3, which hopefully features less fiddly crap with signs, potions, and other nonsense I can't be arsed to commit to memory at the moment.
I'm losing interest in Rising Storm 2: Vietnam, mostly because it feels very, very, very different from good old Red Orchestra: Ostfront. The learning curve is, so far, not very fun at all, and from what I've heard, it's gonna take some 50(!!) hours to get to a point where the game is actually fun. No thanks. If the core gameplay can't grab me out of the gate, I see no purpose in investing 50 hours just to make it fun at a baseline. Your game is either fun and requires me to learn to make it more fun, or it's work.
Yeah, Rising Storm 2 has a pretty high learning curve. I can't even remember when I was only 50 hours in. I currently have 761 logged hours in it now and I still haven't reached the 99 level max.
I still like it though. It's the only current Vietnam game out. Just today there was another big update, I'm actually downloading now at 9gigs. New maps and new weapons.
Dude, what the hell did I watch? A russian made Robocop on a PS3?
I have been absolutely LOVING Battletech. Even without mods, it's a blast to play. I highly, highly recommend it if you dig giant robots and turn-based combat.
your playing them backward's? or is that how there suppose to be played? color me lost lol
I tried getting into The Witcher 2, but...
- The voice acting was....not great.
- The tutorial bugged out and seemed needlessly complex.
- The in-world lore that you apparently have to know to understand what the hell is going on is off-putting, given the other factors. Like, I don't want to invest my time and energy learning a game system if the game's internal design is already kind of wonky.
Not sure I'm gonna continue with that one, and might just skip to The Witcher 3, which hopefully features less fiddly crap with signs, potions, and other nonsense I can't be arsed to commit to memory at the moment.
I'm losing interest in Rising Storm 2: Vietnam, mostly because it feels very, very, very different from good old Red Orchestra: Ostfront. The learning curve is, so far, not very fun at all, and from what I've heard, it's gonna take some 50(!!) hours to get to a point where the game is actually fun. No thanks. If the core gameplay can't grab me out of the gate, I see no purpose in investing 50 hours just to make it fun at a baseline. Your game is either fun and requires me to learn to make it more fun, or it's work.
More and more I find myself becoming extremely critical of gaming in general. I'm looking for a very specific experience from gaming. My gaming time is limited to maybe -- MAYBE -- 2 hours each day. If I'm gonna spend my time playing your game, you gotta grab me right up front. Your game has to be instantly fun for me. That doesn't mean your game can't require me to learn to play it better, but the base gameplay from the first second I start playing has to be fun enough to encourage me to keep playing. If you can't do that, or if your game is "Well, it's fun, but you really have to slog through the first 20 hours to---" NOPE. Sorry. I'm moving on to something else instead.
Games are entertainment. They are not work. If I'm working to try to enjoy your game, your game is not for me. I should enjoy it from the start, and any work put in yields additional enjoyment, rather than "Ugh. I guess I'll slog through this boring, annoying crap if maybe at the end of it there's a decent game." Nope. Not gonna do that. Plenty of games are able to grab me right from the start. Battletech is a good example. The Divison is another good one. Sure, the games get more complex and interesting and deep the longer you play, but right from the jump I'm invested. That's what I'm looking for anymore.